Friday 8 April 2016

Collaboration with the Research Process


http://krissyvenosdale.com/2012/08/18/are-you-a-connected-educator/

I want to best help the student in my school reach their potential, to support them in their learning, and help them to become lifelong learners.  Collaboration among teachers has been identified as one of the key ingredients for successful school improvement and increased teacher satisfaction (Hayes, 2014).  I believe that with our changing world, advances in technology, and new curriculum demands collaborative teaching.  Our change in curriculum is a perfect opportunity to make it the norm to work as a team to meet the needs of students.   The following is my plan on how to improve reference services (not an evaluation of my reference resources) in my library centring on the methods of answering research questions in a collaborative setting and instructing users in the selection and use of appropriate tools and techniques for finding information.  This is of great importance for teachers and students alike as we begin the journey of inquiry based learning in our schools with the new Big Ideas approach with our new curriculum.  Together with teachers in my school, I hope to make the information inquiry process easier and faster for students, thus giving them the necessary research skills in a positive and attainable way so they can become critical thinkers and lifelong learners.
https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/rethinking-curriculum
Analysis of current collaboration on answering of research questions:
Our reference resources in my library are at a decent level, both print and digital forms.  I have come to the point of really enjoying the weeding process and thus my reference section is current and is on its way to being well organized.  There are some holes from my thorough wedding that I need to fill, but will do so overtime as my budget allows for it.  My focus with this plan is on the delivery of the reference services, while of course maintaining a quality resource collection.
Some collaboration has occurred in my school.  Some comparably graded teachers work together to plan units and share ideas, but not all at a grade level unite.  For example, our two kindergarten teachers do work collaboratively, but only two of the three grade 4/5 teachers work together.  We do have curriculum meetings and we divide into primary and intermediate groupings to make plans for the direction of our teaching.  Units may be planned with small groups of teachers, but including the teacher librarian does not occur unless I nudge my way in.  Collaboration is not the norm in our school.   
According to Riedling, 2013, the school librarian should possess three things: knowledge of the collection, effective communication skills, and competence in selecting, organizing, and evaluating resources.   I feel comfortable in my knowledge of my library collection and have gained trust of staff members.  Although it is a work in progress, as I have stated previously, I am well on my way to having an organized reference section in my library.  This is a good start, but I would like to see the role of the teacher librarian outlined by the district so teachers understand what they can expect of me.  Our district has no library framework like Thomson/Okanagan school district or a handbook like Saanich school district.   I would like to see an emphasis put on the research process by my staff.  We have no research model used by any staff member, let alone our school as a united front.   Our school has a library and needs to work towards becoming a learning commons with the goal being to “build learning communities and make connections among learners, thus facilitating knowledge creation in the school community” (Leading Learning, p. 4, 2014). 

Rationale for change and improvements:
It takes teamwork effort to guide each student’s learning.  To help create information literate citizens that can analyse information critically in all its formats and in all media contexts , make decisions based on accurate and current information, use information and communication technologies, respect information sources, (p.6, Achieving Information Literacy, 2006) we need a common framework and a solid school team approach.  A common framework gives consistent vocabulary to the whole student population allowing teachers to broaden and deepen research skills, as the students move through the grades.  There needs to be an increase in the thinking and organization of the development of research activities and collaborating teachers using a common framework can address this need.  Riedling (p.10, 2013) states it is imperative that students possess the skills required to learn efficiently and effectively and can do so learning research problem solving strategies through widely accepted models.   A statement from Teacher Leader Model Standards (p.22, 2008) is that teachers need to experience and model what we want students to be able to do.  This means creating opportunities and cultures within schools for teachers that promote collaboration, sharing of practice, leading from the classroom, and collective responsibility for the success of students.
            My school does not have a role description for a teacher librarian, but I like this description found in the Greater Victoria School District Library Learning Commons handbook:  the teacher librarian works in collaboration with the principal, classroom teachers, school, and district staff to develop a library program that supports, enriches and implements the instructional program of the school.  More specifically, the TL is to work cooperatively with classroom teachers in order to assist students in developing skills in information retrieval and critical thinking so that they may become informed decision makers and lifelong learners (School District 63, Saanich Library Learning Commons Handbook, 2004).  As teachers in my school come to learn my role as a TL, they can come to understand the greatness we can achieve working together.
According to, Leading Learning: Standards of Practice for School Library Learning Commons, 2014, facilitating collaboration cultivates and empowers a community of learners.  There is a plethora of studies  that demonstrate the greater success in student learning and an increase in achievement from collaboration.

Effects on student learning:

The old norms of teachers working in isolation are replaced with new norms of collaboration and teamwork.  Promoting collaboration, support, and teamwork among teachers will create a culture where all members share a strong sense of community and collective responsibility for student success. In turn, success in improving student learning will contribute to teachers’ sense of accomplishment and professional satisfaction (p.26, Teacher Leader Model Standards, 2008). 
In my one year as a teacher librarian at my school, I have been able to collaborate with a few teachers.  Today I was in a classroom working with a grade 3 classroom teacher and our district computer resource teacher doing research on laptops with the 24 students.  What amazing learning was taking place with these students and us three educators!  It wasn’t just the technology or the up to date acquisition of information on the students’ part, but the united front of collaborating teachers helping students with research inquiry.  If we could start even younger and progress deeper with their learning over the period of a student`s time with us, we would have problem solving, critical thinking star learners!  Riedling’s Reference Skills for the School Librarian (p.3, 2013) states, “while student dependence upon the internet to find the answer to their questions has increased, the school librarians roll as provider of quality information resources and as a guide for using information resources effectively will always be important.”  I was able to help the students find reliable, up to date information in an efficient manner today with students walking away with research skills!

My step by step plan:
I will continue to hold effective communication as key to collaboration with my colleagues.   Also, I will continue to work at creating a climate of trust with all staff members as a catalyst for change.  Letting colleagues know that I am there to provide information literacy instruction for inquiry project learning experiences will encourage our collaborative relationship.  I think it is important to seek unique strengths and talents from each teacher and use as them as a resource to help other teachers collaborate.  Another key to implementing my plan is to start working with teachers who have a willingness to work with others so that we are off to a good start role modeling our effect on student learning.
 According to Kamloops/Thomson, A Framework for School Library Programs in the 21st Century (p.9, 2007), an exemplary library program develops cooperative lesson plans with classroom teachers that integrate literature and information literacy skills into subject areas.  Thus, I plan to seek out specific Big Ideas from the new curriculum that support the acquisition of research skills and share with colleagues.  We have a school based Pro-D Day in April focusing on the new curriculum that I have time to present to my staff about my role as a teacher librarian and how I can help with the new curriculum.  Collaborative relationships between classroom teachers and school librarians have a significant impact on learning, particularly in relation to the planning of instructional units (Haycock, School Libraries and Student Achievement, 2003). 
https://tl-pi.wikispaces.com/Overview+Points+of+Inquiry
http://uhigh-ilstu.libguides.com/c.php?g=445837&p=3041380

For our May Pro-D Day, I plan to introduce various research models (Big 6, Research Process, and Points of Inquiry) and hopefully come to a consensus with staff, as to choosing one for our school to follow in our inquiry based learning journey come September. This means if I introduce this model to each class in the library, I will have the teachers backing up the learning with having the same knowledge and language.  In September, as teachers create their year plans, I will touch base with each teacher and make it known I am there to rotate through each classroom throughout the year to work together on research.  I will inform them to please let me know which units they are doing which would be best to have me fit into to collaboratively teach.  By doing this I hope to make it the expectation and norm that we work together.  Then we can use Haycock’s stages (objective, content, sequence, methodology, activities, evaluation) in the Collaborative Planning process to promote reference services and produce critical thinking, creative, successful units.   I know this will all take place gradually as it is a process! 
http://www.howdesign.com/parse/process-this/

Monthly curriculum team meetings can be used for me to have a few minutes to promote another resource, demonstrate its use in research, and role model its value in a friendly and positive way.  By doing this, teachers will see value in having me into their classroom to work together sharing our knowledge.
This past month, I approached my administrator with the idea of using the prep time I fill in the form of HACE and PE for teachers, to be research skills next year.  Thus I can further implement our soon-to-be-newly acquired chosen research model to all classes.  I will touch base in early May when teacher placements are occurring to provide additional information to my administrator.
I hope to connect to each teacher one at a time: gaining trust, rapport  and demonstrating the benefits of collaboration.  As Haycock (2003) suggests, “the core of teacher-librarianship – collaboration and partnerships – rests on positive and productive relationships with colleagues and other staff.”  As I go I will identify reference resources that are quality, easy to access, and easy to use so success for teachers and thus students.


Who I need involved to implement my plan:

Administrator, teacher librarian, classroom teachers, learning resource teacher, support staff (they know the unique students best!), district curriculum coordinator, aboriginal education resource teacher, students

Other considerations:


To see success of my plan, I will require feedback from teachers, students, and my administrator. Observing growth of students in their ability to follow a research plan will demonstrate the effects of choosing a research model for our school.  Overtime I hope that teachers will see the advantages of using a variety of reference materials, in all formats in collaboration with their colleagues.  I need to have the cooperation of the staff.  I realize there may be staff members adverse to these changes.  Everyone will deal with the curriculum changes in their own way.  I will support them in a way that works best for them and with patience.  I hope to provide opportunities to introduce, practice, maintain and refine information literacy skills and abilities for staff within my budget. 

References
Asselin, M., Branch, J., & Oberg, D. (2003). Achieving information literacy. Ottawa: Canadian School Library Association.
Haycock, K. (2003). School libraries and student achievement. Teacher Librarian,31(1), 34. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/224890944?accountid=14656
Hayes, T. (2016). Library to Learning Commons | Canadian Education Association (CEA)Cea-ace.ca. Retrieved 9 April 2016, from http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/library-learning-commons
Leading Learning: Standards of Practice for School Library Learning Commons in Canada. (2014). Retrieved 9 April 2016, from http://, Leading Learning: Standards of practice for school library learning commons in Canada, 2014,
Riedling, A., Shake, L., & Houston, C. (2013). Reference skills for the school librarian. Santa Barbara, California: Linworth, an imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC.
SchoolDistrict63Saanich Library Handbook. (2016). Google Docs. Retrieved 9 April 2016, from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DJnXjpIsFG6FGljkvyTcFUYmcfRtJzs6z6U_rm7gNuE/edit?usp=gmail
Sd. 73, K. (2016). A Framework for School Library Programs of the 21st Century. Retrieved 9 April 2016, from http://hgec.sd73.bc.ca/sites/hgec.sd73.bc.ca/files/WebPDF.pdf

Teacher Leader Model Standards. (2008). Retrieved 9 April 2016, from https://www.ets.org/s/education_topics/teaching_quality/pdf/teacher_leader_model_standards.pdf

Thursday 31 March 2016

Theme #3: Prepare them for Life

As the 13 weeks of this course conclude, it is this final third of the course that I found the most challenging.  It had me stepping outside of my comfort zone for sure.  I was comfortable learning about evaluating and selecting common tools of the reference collection in my library, but the gray literature, catalogue searching and deep web topics were….well, deep topics for me to delve into.  A solid piece of advice I took from the UC Berkeley, Invisible or Deep Web article is to simply add the word database to my subject term and voila I find a searchable database. 
http://lfb.org/access-the-dark-web-in-5-minutes-or-less/
Some time and patience and I am already more comfortable than I was a few short weeks ago.  Our colleague whom compared the deep web with an iceberg gave me an excellent visual that I have already shared with my four grade 6/7 classes to give them an explanation as to why research requires us to dig deeper than Wikipedia or Google.  All my time spent exploring the UBC catalogue and deep web has given me a
better understanding of what students must think and feel when doing research!

          I enjoyed the debates with my fellow students in this section of the course, about the value of Wikipedia versus encyclopedia.  Although I see value in Wikipedia, I also understand that it has its place and use.  The week’s readings led me to Wikipedia to search the “reliability of Wikipedia” from Wikipedia's own point of view.  I wanted to see what hoaxes and such existed according to Wikipedia themselves (Interesting to note that Wikipedia admits their own errors but also have a page of errors on Encyclopedia Britannica).  I found this interesting:  In a 2004 piece called "The Faith-Based Encyclopedia", Robert McHenry, a former editor-in-chief of Encyclopedia Britannica, stated that Wikipedia errs in billing itself as an encyclopaedia, because that word implies a level of authority and accountability that he believes cannot be possessed by an openly editable reference.  McHenry argued that "the typical user doesn't know how conventional encyclopaedia achieve reliability, only that they do (Reliability of Wikipedia, 2016).  However, leaders of Wikipedia like Jimmy Wales are honest about Wikipedia’s limitations and agree with schools that prohibit citing Wikipedia for research (Harris, 2007).  The long of the short is, information literacy skills need to be taught and according to Berinstein (2006) that because of Wikipedia's known methodology and vulnerabilities, it provides opportunities to teach (and learn) critical thinking.  We all need to adapt to our changing world and garner the most use of Wikipedia and from encyclopdias.  Christopher Harris (2007) summed up encyclopedia/Wikipedia use very well in my opinion:  

1) At least three sources are required to verify research.
2) General encyclopedias like Wikipedia are a great place to get started, however …
3) Serious research projects cannot cite general knowledge encyclopedias.
https://storify.com/millere93/britannica-vs-wikipedia


         As far as my skills matching the right tool to the information need, I am feeling more confident with this each day.  With time exploring the existing resources in my library and the ease of using Riedling's criteria for selecting and evaluating resources, I feel I have a good grasp of what I have for resources and what I need to add to my library.  Of the criteria suggested by Riedling (2013), two statements stay with me and apply to all references, from the atlas to the thesaurus, in my quest for selecting perfect references: items must be based on the needs of the school, students, and community (p. 52) and ease of use is a critical factor (p.53).

c



Teaching is a calling.  We are here to inspire and nurture student interests.  Teacher librarians do that but also promote collaboration, integrate technology, teach information literacy, and move forward with research inquiry.  We help students become successful as lifelong learners.


Errors in the Encyclopædia Britannica that have been corrected in Wikipedia. (2016). Wikipedia. Retrieved 31 March 2016, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Errors_in_the_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica_that_have_been_corrected_in_Wikipedia
Guides, B., & Events, N. (2016). Wikipedia and Britannica: The Kid̢۪s All Right (And So̢۪s the Old Man). Infotoday.com. Retrieved 1 April 2016, from http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/mar06/berinstein.shtml
Harris, C., Karen Jensen, T., Karen Jensen, T., Commander, B., Jonker, T., & Bird, E. et al. (2016). Can We Make Peace with Wikipedia?. School Library Journal. Retrieved 1 April 2016, from http://www.slj.com/2007/06/reviews/reference/can-we-make-peace-with-wikipedia/#_
Kodama, C. (2014). Reference Skills for the School Librarian: Tools and Tips . 3rd ed. By Ann Marlow Riedling, Loretta Shake, and Cynthia Houston. Santa Barbara, CA: Linworth, 2013. Pp. viii+148. $45.00 (paper). ISBN 978–1–58683–528–6. The Library Quarterly, 84(2), 252-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/675336
Kupersmith, J. (2016). Invisible Web: What it is, Why it exists, How to find it, and Its inherent ambiguity. Lib.berkeley.edu. Retrieved 1 April 2016, from http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/InvisibleWeb.html
Kupersmith, J. (2016). Invisible Web: What it is, Why it exists, How to find it, and Its inherent ambiguity. Lib.berkeley.edu. Retrieved 1 April 2016, from http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/InvisibleWeb.html
McHenry, R. (2016). The Faith-Based Encyclopedia - TCS Daily. Ideasinactiontv.com. Retrieved 1 April 2016, from http://www.ideasinactiontv.com/tcs_daily/2004/11/the-faith-based-encyclopedia.html

Reliability of Wikipedia. (2016). Wikipedia. Retrieved 31 March 2016, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia




Friday 4 March 2016

Assignment #2: Empower a Community of Learners

Picture fromhttps://sites.google.com/a/msad60.org/technology-is-learning/samr-model



There are so many benefits for all involved in collaboration within our school.  According to, Leading Learning: Standards of Practice for School Library Learning Commons, 2014, facilitating collaboration cultivates and empowers a community of learners.  Hayes, 2014 states that collaboration among teachers has been identified as one of the key ingredients for successful school improvement and increased teacher satisfaction.  As for students fortunate enough to work with a collaborative team of teachers, there are multiple studies to demonstrate greater success in student learning and an increase in achievement (see http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-2/librarians.html).  As a Teacher Librarian, I have the opportunity to make an impact on teaching practices and the potential to help teachers evolve their teaching approaches.  I am using the SAMR model approach to change (Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition and the impact of technology on teaching and instruction), to look at where two teachers are currently at with their practice and then outline the potential of where we can go, working collaboratively.

I was fortunate to have a teacher in our school, Miss. Harmony, who wanted to work collaboratively with me (the Teacher Librarian), and her grade 6/7 class this past month.  Miss Harmony and I have worked together in her class before doing small book clubs so our working relationship is solid and we have mutual trust.  She came to me with little time for her students to cover a social studies unit on identity, society and culture: comparing Canada with other countries (IRP, Social Studies, Grade 6,P.41).  This month alone found her having the Health Nurse in for talks with the grade 7’s, FSA tests, two pro-d days, Family Day and four ski days for the class.  It left her little time for academics and limited time to cover this topic.  This is her second year in our school, but she has over seven years of teaching experience.  She sees value in using technology in the classroom, as she feels her students respond well and are more engaged than when working with print resources.  Students in her class have used computers to watch study jam science videos and have typed out some assignments.  However, she is concerned about how much time it takes to have students work on computers.  She was looking for a way for the students to have easy access to information and not have to spend hours searching.  Applying the SAMR  model, Miss Harmony sits in the Substitution level, with the typed out copies of an assignment being a substitution of the students’ written work and students being given a website link for study jams, thus a teacher directed lesson.  For this new unit of study on Canada, Miss Harmony decided on the criteria for what she needed her students to learn and I offered various resources for her to use with her class. 
Picture from https://www.newlenoxlibrary.org/culturegrams
I demonstrated to Miss Harmony the ease of using a new resource, Culturegrams, where all students in the class would have access to up to date information, they can all use the resource at the same time on their exact topic, and had 200 countries to choose from to compare to Canada.  I spent time in the class with the teacher and walked students through various aspects of the site.  We then allowed time for the class to explore the site on their laptops, before having students begin their comparison of countries.  I helped students find extra information for their research through the use of the district digital resources.  Miss Harmony opted on having students present their learning in the form of a poster, with pictures, text, and graphs printed off.

I feel I was able to help Miss Harmony move into the Augmentation level with our use of technology with her class.  With a small amount of support she was able to make a change in her teaching practice and found that the use of technology did make teaching easier.  She gained insight into a new resource to use with her students.  Students used technology for their information research, learned to make comparison graphs, watched slideshows and videos, and downloaded pictures (citing their finds, too!).  Miss Harmony saved time gathering materials and resources by working with me and students met their prescribed learning outcome efficiently, which was a goal for Miss Harmony.   Miss Harmony is now more comfortable using technology for research in her classroom.  This was one small step for Miss Harmony to help her gain confidence with the use of technology.  If Miss Harmony was allotted more time to experiment with other aspects in technology, such as at a professional development day or our curriculum meetings, then she could have practice time and continue to build up her confidence in the use of technology.  Allowing time for collaboration would allow me the opportunity to demonstrate other new resources.  For example, to continue helping Miss Harmony grow in her teaching practice in regards to the use of technology and help her move to the modification level, I would encourage Miss Harmony to have students use something like Google

Docs
for the students to present their learning instead of a cut and paste poster.  With Google Docs, students would be able share their work directly with the teacher and receive peer and teacher feedback as they worked.

Another teacher in our school, Miss Hugs, was willing to try collaborative teaching with me.  She has been a primary teacher for about 15 years and we have been in the same school for three years.  We have a friendly relationship and I have helped solve minor technology problems in her class over time and so she knows I am willing to help.  With a promise of being with her each step, Miss Hugs accepted an offer from me to try using just a bit of technology in her grade 2/3 class instead of doing her usual research topic with print resources and learning demonstrated through a book report.  She is not even in the Substitution level, as Miss Hugs has never used computers with her class.  Miss Hugs was doing a life science unit on animals (IRP, Science, Grade 2,p.25).  I set the students up with their passwords and they quickly learned to log on.  I role modelled with the students how to search, copy, and save pictures of an animal on the internet using our digital World Book Encyclopedia (a new resource to Miss Hugs).  Once students chose their animal and found and saved 5-7 pictures, I introduced digital storytelling

Picture from https://americantesol.com/blogger/teach-with-digital-storytelling/
 I demonstrated how to upload their pictures, add captions, add music, and order their pictures.  Students LOVED recording their voice, as they talked about each picture describing the appearance, habitat, life cycle, classification, and diet of their animal.  Once all students completed their project, they were shared with the class and students classified their fellow classmates’ animal as a mammal, reptile, amphibian, etc. after listening to the recorded stories.  We then emailed the presentations to parents.


I feel that Miss Hugs made a huge step in her teaching practice!  She took a risk and went from no computer use, skipped over the substitution level and collaboratively we augmented and modified her lesson.  Miss Hugs is willing to experiment more with her current practice, is open to change, and immensely enjoyed the collaboration!  It was a small step together but an impressive demonstration of the value of collaboration.  The more you practice something the better you become at it, so Miss Hugs knows she needs to keep using technology in her classroom to become more comfortable and work her way through the SAMR levels.  Few factors stand in the way for Miss Hugs and I to continue collaborating.  Miss Hugs is open to continue collaborating and our professional rapport has only strengthened.  Access to all ideal resources due to limited library budgets and time to get together to collaborate are the only factors that could hamper our gains with her students’ learning.  We hope to use extra time at the ends of our curriculum meetings and lunch hours to collaborate and continue experimenting with different resources, new practice means, and are ready to start in on other research projects in the new curriculum.

Collaboration was a winner for Miss Harmony, Miss Hugs and me.  My colleagues were inspired by trying something new and so was I!  The ripple effect found students engaged with their learning and all students in both classes feeling success, as all of them completed the assignment.  Parents of Miss Hugs’ students loved the opportunity to see their child’s learning in a new format.  Time allotted for collaboration will motivate teachers to adapt their teaching practices and consequently their teaching effectiveness will improve.   With the new curriculum focussing on research and inquiry models, it is a perfect time for our school to look at how we want to structure our learning to make lessons more interactive and engaging.  I believe an increase in teacher librarian hours would allow for more flexibility in the schedule meaning, more teachers have opportunity to work collaboratively with the teacher librarian.  We can look at how techniques and resources need to be shared for more powerful learning. Helping students with their information processing and analysis skills will help to create lifelong learners.  It is a gradual process that requires time, trust, and connecting to truly infuse technology into teaching and learning, which will enhance our learning successes.
Picture from http://www.parkviewalliance.com/life-long-learning/


References
Bced.gov.bc.ca,. (2016). Curriculum. Retrieved 4 March 2016, from https://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/irp/welcome.php
Canadian Library Association,. (2014). Leading Learning: Standards of Practice for School Library Learning Commons in Canada. Retrieved 4 March 2016, from http://clatoolbox.ca/casl/slic/llsop.pdf
Cea-ace.ca,. (2016). Library to Learning Commons | Canadian Education Association (CEA). Retrieved 4 March 2016, from http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/library-learning-commons
Cea-ace.ca,. (2016). Library to Learning Commons | Canadian Education Association (CEA). Retrieved 4 March 2016, from http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/library-learning-commons
Culturegrams.com,. (2016). CultureGrams: Concise, reliable, and up-to-date country reports on 200 cultures of the world. Retrieved 4 March 2016, from http://www.culturegrams.com/
Ericdigests.org,. (2016). Teachers and Librarians: Collaborative Relationships. ERIC Digest.. Retrieved 4 March 2016, from http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-2/librarians.html
Google.ca,. (2016). Google Docs - create and edit documents online, for free.. Retrieved 4 March 2016, from https://www.google.ca/docs/about/

Sites.google.com,. (2016). SAMR Model - Technology Is Learning. Retrieved 4 March 2016, from https://sites.google.com/a/msad60.org/technology-is-learning/samr-model

Saturday 20 February 2016

Theme 2: The Value of a Teacher Librarian

Theme 2: The Value of a Teacher Librarian
picture: http://robertjohnmeehan.blogspot.ca/

     Riedling (p.99), 2013, states that school library media specialist must have an exceptional knowledge of the library media centre’s collection.  How true!  As each student or teacher comes in with their new research question, I am so much better able to help them find accurate and appropriate information and they see value in me and the library’s resources.  My best walk away thought from this week’s readings is the importance of developing effective interview strategies to educate the TEACHERs on the importance of student information skills and co-operative planning.  Haycock (p.26), 2007, states that most of the literature on teacher-teacher-librarian collaboration appears in journals and other publications read by teacher-librarians themselves, and consequently, the lack of acceptance of collaboration as a norm of teacher behavior is also common.  This is an area I feel is difficult for me in my school.  I am working to have teachers see the value in my job as a teacher librarian (thus I need to know my resources) and to come to me to work collaboratively with references and research planning.   As stated in Together for Learning (p.40) 2010, the Learning Commons has great potential, but only when everyone participates.
picture: http://venspired.com/that-kind-of-collaboration/

     I do feel overwhelmed when I read about the many aspects of my role as a teacher librarian and trying to fit it all in with my limited work hours.  Reading through the responsibilities I also do feel good about what I have accomplished, but know I am falling short in the learning resource management area.  I am completely missing out on developing school library policies and procedures and have had zero talk of this with anyone in my school or district.   Also, after reading that a responsibility in my role is to participate in an information network with district schools I went looking to get connected and found our district needs some help in this area.  I am happy to have had the nudge to get this going and found another librarian in my district who had tried to start something up last year, but hopefully together we can make it happen.

     One statement from Lesson 7 (Libe 467 course reading) that is thought to maybe have come from Mae West, "It's not necessarily what you've got, but what you do with what you've got that's important", says it perfectly.  We all have time and budget restraints.  We just need to be innovative with our time, creative with the resources, and inventive with the budget to make our library its best.  It will prove to our users of the value of us as TLs and of our libraries.  As for me and reference materials, I plan to keep my focus on a current collection, with both print and online reference materials.  I will keep focussed on the importance of reference sources in the development of student information skills and build up from there, proving the worth of a TL to one teacher at a time!!

Haycock, K. (2016). Collaboration: Critical success factors for student learning. Scholarworks.sjsu.edu. Retrieved 20 February 2016, from http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=slis_pub

Riedling, A., Shake, L., & Houston, C. (2013). Reference skills for the school librarian. Santa Barbara, California: Linworth, an imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC.

Together for Learning School Libraries and the Emergence of the Learning Commons,. (2010). Ontario LIbrary Association. Retrieved 20 February 2016, from https://www.accessola.org/web/Documents/OLA/Divisions/OSLA/TogetherforLearning.pdf

Sunday 7 February 2016

Assignment 1: Exploring an atlas...

Exploring of an atlas in my library…
Two grade 6/7 classes in my school are doing a unit in social studies on identity, society and culture: comparing Canada with other countries and came to the library for resources. (https://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/irp/pdfs/social_studies/2006ssk7_6.pdf  p.41)    I first went to our various country books.   5 out of 13 countries chosen by students were represented by print books in the library ranging in dates from 1974 to our most current country book of 2003.  Next stop was the reference area to delve into our world atlases.  We have six world Atlases (1979, 1990, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2010) on our shelves.  According to Achieving Information Literacy: Standards for School Library Programs in Canada, reference atlases should be five years old at most.  Thus, it is an easy weeding of five of the six atlases.  My best/most current reference to offer two classes of 27 students is one copy of National Geographic Kids Our World (2010).

It cost a mere $15.00 to purchase and  would be appropriate for grades 4-7.  National Geographic is a reputable publisher for geographic references.  This atlas has 115 pages of full-size colour maps (physical and political), data, essays about the world, quick facts, flags of 194 countries, and lots of intriguing images all in a nice size book.   I feel the scale in this atlas is effective and appropriate for my student population and the index is solid.  The book gives a quick snapshot of a country, a continent and includes outside websites.  It does have a National geographic website intended to extend learning and allow a person to explore further.  The website is supposed to match the book so that the user can search by page number or map and find the corresponding video, photo, games, or audio.  However, newer editions of the book have since been printed and the icons/page numbers are useless in matching to the website.  Also unfortunate, the book does not open flat and so some maps span over two pages leaving information unreadable in the centre at the binding.
      Looking at the quality and usefulness of this reference book in terms of relevancy, currency, curricular connections, efficient use of library space, and purpose will demonstrate the value of this reference in meeting a user’s informational needs.   An atlas is simply a book of maps containing a variety of information on the said area including pictures and/or tables and charts.  It gives geographical answers and knowledge of the world around us and thus is a needed resource in a library.  A world atlas allows for a more in depth understanding of geography.  It is a needed reference in a library to increase learning of a specific area, country, and the world and our place in it. Use of an atlas is needed for elementary curricular areas such as social studies-human and physical environment and language arts-reading different materials for a purpose.  One mere book, which is found in our small reference section, is so extremely small that efficient use of library space does not even need to come into question. This world atlas is recommended for grades 3-7 (although vocabulary in it would be challenging for grade threes), enjoyable, readable, only accessible for one student at a time, but gives information needed by the user through engaging, colourful, and informative clear maps.  A student can use this reference book to gain a snapshot view of a country or find data on a country to compare with other countries so fills the needs of one student.

Rubric for National Geographic Kids Edition World Atlas:

Not Meeting
Meeting
Exceeding
Purpose
Little or no connections to the curriculum, accessible for one user
  Most of the material supports curriculum standards for some grades 2-7, searchable with guidance, accessible for more than one user (e.g. if print – have more than one copy)
Fits needs of  intended audience (many Gr. 2-7 curricular connections) snapshot of a country, data and maps of country, accessible for many students to use at once, easily searchable
Publisher
Neither respected nor  well known reputation
Good reputation
Well respected, reputation well known for quality geographic materials, credible authors and editor
Currency
More than 5 years old
0-5 years old, not updated yearly, majority of material is current
Includes changes in today’s world, updated every year, current content, provides date of latest update or most current edition
Format
Print only, vocabulary difficult, poorly organized, appropriate for a limited audience only
Audience friendly for several grades, easy to read, layout clear
Grade 2-7 audience friendly, easy to read, pictures, clear site/book layout, strong organization of web design/book, flexibility
Content
Little information,  limited access, not user friendly, maps/scales/indexes not clear
comprehensive, easy-to-use educational resource
24/7 information access, scale is appropriate for Grades 2-7, maps are clear, colouful and informative, comprehensive and user friendly index, table of contents
Although this book is of a reputable company and would be a good print reference for its purpose.  It is outdated, does not have an extensive flexibility to cover more curriculum, and only one student can access it while at school.  An outdated atlas, no matter how colourful and full of data, is of little use when it has not kept up with the changing world.  Having one print atlas does not meet the needs to service a full class of up to 30 children nor is it much help to my teaching community.

Potential replacement atlas……….
My job as a Teacher Librarian is to provide access to materials in all formats, as well as to provide instruction and resources that reflect the current information environment.  With students preferring electronic resources over print, the ease of many students at a time being able to access an electronic reference 24/7, and for the best chance at keeping pace with the ever changing world I have looked at internet sources to replace my library’s print world atlas.  I, as the Teacher Librarian, need to help students learn the art of skillful researching from print or from on line resources.  Potential replacements for my sole world atlas in the library are the following free sites:

This site has colour physical and political maps, facts and statistics on countries of the world.  Not a paid site so contains advertisements.

Viewing of maps.

This site has online maps about Canada's environment, society, economy and history.

This site has colour physical maps, facts, and statistics on countries of the world.  Not a paid site so contains advertisements.

Students require time and know how to evaluate and practice determining relevance of the information in front of them.  They need to be able to cite their research to prove authority or credibility of an online database.   Therefore, I decided it was best to have a reliable, vetted database which would also be free of advertisements.  The American Association of School Libraries  (http://www.ala.org/aasl/standards-guidelines/program-guidelines) provides research and information on online reference databases and one can find information about my chosen on line replacement atlas in CULTUREGRAMS.  Culturegrams is an online database from ProQuest and the Kids Edition and Provinces Edition would be perfectly suited for grade 2-7.  Its website boasts that, “CultureGrams™ is the leading primary source reference for concise, reliable, and up-to-date cultural information on the countries of the world. It goes beyond mere facts and figures to deliver an insider's perspective on daily life and culture, including the history, customs, and lifestyles of the world's people. CultureGrams provides vetted, quick-reference information on countries around the world via an easy to use, reasonably attractive web interface. The children’s edition is a popular resource for school projects, and contains information spanning the geography, history, culture, and demographics of each country.”  It has links to slideshows, videos, a photo gallery, interviews, data, maps, distance calculations, world averages, currency and much, much more.  Information is easily navigable and there are content tools to guide you around the site.  Tables and graphs can be made on the site comparing one country with up to 9 other countries in terms of such things as population to life expectancy.



     This new resource will greatly add to our library collection.  Again, looking at the quality and usefulness of this online Reference in terms of purpose, relevancy, currency, curricular connections and efficient use of library space will show the value of this resource.   It meets criteria for our school’s needs in all areas at an exceeding level.  Having a reference book on line allows students to seek information with more efficiency and it definitely provides a springboard for an inquiry based approach in learning.  It fits with current Social Studies, Math, Science and Language Arts learning outcomes and allows flexibility in direction of learning for students which will work with our new curriculum. The site has teacher lessons and this resource would be accessible to the entire student and teaching population.  Reports are reviewed and updates are done twice a year to ensure current and correct information.  I like that Culturegrams gives a two week free trial period as it is allowing time for some colleagues to check it out and give input on the program’s  worth.  Our library is host to three desktop computers and four laptops meaning the resource is an efficient use of library space.  There are an additional four carts of laptops for signing out across the hall.  Adding this digital reference item takes up zero space of our current library.  The site comes recommended to me by a veteran teacher librarian.

Rubric for Culturegrams:

Not Meeting
Meeting
Exceeding
Purpose
Little or no connections to the curriculum, accessible for one user
 Most of the material supports curriculum standards for some grades 2-7, searchable with guidance, accessible for more than one user (e.g. if print – have more than one copy)
Fits needs of  intended audience (many Gr. 2-7 curricular connections) snapshot of a country, data and maps of country, accessible for many students to use at once, easily searchable
Publisher
Neither respected nor  well known reputation
Good reputation
Well respected, reputation well known for quality geographic materials, credible authors and editor
Currency
More than 5 years old
0-5 years old, not updated yearly, majority of material is current
Includes changes in today’s world, updated every year, current content, provides date of latest update or most current edition
Format
Print only, vocabulary difficult, poorly organized, appropriate for a limited audience only
Audience friendly for several grades, easy to read, layout clear
Grade 2-7 audience friendly, easy to read, pictures, clear site/book layout, strong organization of web design/book, flexibility
Content
Little information,  limited access, not user friendly, maps/scales/indexes not clear
comprehensive, easy-to-use educational resource
24/7 information access, scale is appropriate for Grades 2-7, maps are clear, colouful and informative, comprehensive and user friendly index, table of contents

 Our one school is host to 410 students and the district has 5 highschools and 14 elementary schools in total.  Here is the price quoted to me for the product:

Culture Grams Online Edition includes World Edition, 206 informative country reports detailing the lifestyles, customs, courtesies, and more of world culturesStates Edition51 colorful reports on the U.S. states, including maps, flags, and symbols; Kids Edition, 89 engaging country reports written for upper-elementary students; Canadian Province Edition focusing on 13 provinces and territories with categories specific to Canadian culture.


12-month subscription for Coldstream Elementary: $570 (USD)
12-month subscription for entire School District 22: $5,210 (USD)

Includes unlimited usage and remote access at no additional charge.


Please feel free to contact me with further questions or to move forward with a subscription.

Regards,
Gary
Gary Katz, Account Manager
ProQuest, 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 USA 
800 521 0600 ext. 74075  Fax 1 866 650 2558
gary.katz@proquest.com

Overall, Culturegrams contains excellent content, is user friendly 24/7, allows for multiple users at one time, multimedia, is a trusted site, is a widely used cultural reference, and enhances curriculum.  It is a strong addition to any reference section of a library with its huge flexibility and wealth of information.  Culturegrams only flaws are cost and that not all countries of the world are reported on.  Taking into account that my district has approximately 8,200 students, then it is a mere 64 cents per student for a year’s subscription.  89 countries are covered through the Kids Edition and over 200 for the World Edition, which although is not every country in the world, it covers a lot more countries with more details than one print atlas alone.

Ala.org,. (2016). Empowering Learners: | American Association of School Librarians (AASL). Retrieved 7 February 2016, from http://www.ala.org/aasl/standards-guidelines/program-guidelines

Asselin, M., Branch, J., & Oberg, D. (2003). Achieving information literacy. Ottawa: Canadian School Library Association.

Atlapedia.com,. (2016). Atlapedia® Online. Retrieved 7 February 2016, from http://www.atlapedia.com/

Bced,. (2016). SS Grade 6. Retrieved 7 February 2016, from https://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/irp/pdfs/social_studies/2006ssk7_6.pdf

Culturegrams.com,. (2016). CultureGrams: Concise, reliable, and up-to-date country reports on 200 cultures of the world. Retrieved 7 February 2016, from http://www.culturegrams.com/

Google Maps,. (2016). Google Maps. Retrieved 7 February 2016, from https://www.google.ca/maps/@50.2251988,-119.2460876,14z

Map, W. (2016). World Atlas / World Map / Atlas of the World Including Geography Facts and Flags - Worldatlas.com - WorldAtlas.com. Worldatlas.com. Retrieved 7 February 2016, from http://www.worldatlas.com/aatlas/world.htm

National Geographic World Atlas. (2010) (3rd ed.). Washington, DC.

Nrcan.gc.ca,. (2015). The Atlas of Canada | Natural Resources Canada. Retrieved 7 February 2016, from http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-sciences/geography/atlas-canada

Screencast.com,. (2016). CultureGrams 4-Minute Overview. Retrieved 7 February 2016, from http://www.screencast.com/t/bgWlE9a1lrap